Christian Lindell vs Marc Dijkhuizen Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L W L L L
Form
L W W W L L W W L LH2H: Lindell 1 - 0 Dijkhuizen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lindell winning 2 and Dijkhuizen winning 0. The last match between Lindell and Dijkhuizen was at the Switzerland F4 (Neuchatel), 28-08-2018, First, Clay with Christian Lindell getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Christian Lindell | 1 |
| Marc Dijkhuizen | 0 |
Switzerland F4 (Neuchatel)(28-08-2018)
6
1
6
2
| Lindell | Stats | Dijkhuizen |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 177 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 33 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 13 | Titles | 0 |
| 59% (442-303) | Career Total W/L | 50% (114-114) |
| $68,305 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Griekspoor PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Lindell VS Dijkhuizen H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Christian Lindell
Player
Marc Dijkhuizen
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Lindell VS Dijkhuizen H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:2:0 | Average Match Time | 1:2:0 |
| 60% (25/42) | 1st Serve % | 60% (31/52) |
| 80% (20/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (13/31) |
| 59% (10/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 58% (30/52) | Return Points Win % | 29% (12/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Christian Lindell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Christian Lindell
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Christian Lindell
78%
(
73 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Christian Lindell
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Patrik Rikl
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Christian Lindell
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Christian Lindell
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Christian Lindell
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Christian Lindell
41%
(
46 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
52%
(
34 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Christian Lindell
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Christian Lindell
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marc Dijkhuizen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Marc Dijkhuizen
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zachary Eisinga
Player
Marc Dijkhuizen
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
23
Total Points Won
9
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Marc Dijkhuizen
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
Player
Marc Dijkhuizen
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Marc Dijkhuizen
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (442/303) | Win/Loss | 50% (114/114) |
| 57% (973/720) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (253/254) |
| 53% (8362/7537) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2277/2260) |
| 51% (27/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (34/32) |
| 60% (415/271) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (80/82) |
| 0% (0/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1574 | Aces Total | 183 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1283 | Total Double Faults | 412 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 599.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 356.37 |
| 60% (17697/29405) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3992/6716) |
| 68% (12009/17697) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2470/3992) |
| 48% (5578/11712) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1251/2724) |
| 42% (1312/3093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (311/749) |
| 41% (12005/29485) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2768/6720) |
| 50% (4/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (3/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37% (13/22) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (90/108) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (332/164) | Futures W/L | 50% (114/114) |
| 59% (425/719) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (114/225) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (108/202) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (14/34) |
| 53% (115/217) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (29/54) |
| 89% (430/382) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (118/103) |
| 11% (430/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (118/15) |
| 19% (315/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (110/11) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
